Whether they like it or not, Blake Lively and Taylor Swift’s friendship and any bad blood between them this week became the heart of Lively’s ongoing legal battle with It Ends With Us co-star and director Justin Baldoni – but it didn’t last long.
On Wednesday, lawyers for Lively condemned allegations in a letter by Baldoni’s main attorney that the actress’ team threatened the “Shake It Off” superstar singer with a public drubbing if she didn’t offer a full-throated public support for her old pal as “scandalous” and “completely false.”
More from Deadline
On Thursday, just after Bryan Freedman reiterated his claim about the requested support and threats to “release private text messages of a personal nature” if the recently subpoenaed Swift wasn’t publicly behind Lively, the judge in the multimillion-dollar suit between the IEWU stars shut the whole sideshow down.
“The Letter is improper and must be stricken,” ordered Judge Lewis J. Liman in response to a motion by Lively’s side filed mere hours after Freedman’s letter. “It is irrelevant to any issue before this Court and does not request any action from this Court.”
Liman (who, as we’ve mentioned before, is the brother of director Doug Liman) goes on to say of Freedman’s letter in his order: It concerns a subpoena proceeding in the District of Columbia over which this Court has no authority. The sole purpose of the Letter is to ‘promote public scandal’ by advancing inflammatory accusations, on information and belief, against Lively and her counsel. It transparently invites a press uproar by suggesting that Lively and her counsel attempted to ‘extort’ a well-known celebrity. Retaining the Letter on the docket would be of no use to the Court and would allow the Court’s docket to serve as a ‘reservoir of libelous statements for press consumption.’ The same is true for the Wayfarer Parties’ subsequent submission, which the Court will strike sua sponte for the same reasons.”
That “subsequent submission” Liman refers to is another letter from Freedman today that claims to name names – actually, one name specifically.
That name is attorney J. Douglas Baldridge.
A longtime lawyer for Swift, Baldridge is a partner out of Venables LLP’s DC office. Since 2023, the George Washington University Law School graduate has also been the general counsel for Swift’s 13 Management.
With Venables fighting the “abuse of the discovery process” subpoena, as the firm termed it in its own filing, that could drag itself and Swift into the the Lively-Baldoni brawl, Freedman offered more details of a potentially explosive call from February. Emphasizing the Super Bowl on February 9 that Swift attended but Lively was absent from, the claimed conversation appears to have sought to stamp out speculation that Swift was distancing herself from Lively due to the latter’s dust-up with Baldoni, his Wayfarer Studios, its execs and PR leaders Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel.
Citing his response to a voicemail from “a person very closely linked to Taylor Swift,” Freedman said in a corresponding affidavit: “During the February 14th phone call, which lasted approximately one hour, the speaker told me that they had been informed that J. Douglas Baldridge, counsel for Taylor Swift and a partner at Venable LLP, had received a phone call from Michael Gottlieb, counsel for Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds during which Mr. Gottlieb requested, on Ms. Lively’ s behalf, that Taylor Swift make a social media statement in support of Ms. Lively given her absence from the Super Bowl that year, and stated that if Ms. Swift failed to do so, Ms. Lively would release “ten years” of private texts with Ms. Swift. The individual also told me that they had been informed that Mr. Baldridge had accused Mr. Gottlieb of extortion and ended the call.”
Neither Baldridge nor reps for Swift responded to request for comment from Deadline on today’s filings, letters and Liman’s order. However, in response to the now struck filings Thursday by Baldoni’s side to have a motion for sanctions rebuffed, and before Liman ruled on the matter, Gottlieb had a new and strongly worded statement for Deadline.
“Another day, another bogus filing designed for click bait,” the Willkie Farr & Gallagher lawyer said.
“We reiterate our unequivocal denial, which Mr. Freedman has now admitted rely completely upon a source, no matter who it is, that doesn’t even claim to have witnessed the conversations that Freedman describes, making this triple-hearsay statement as unreliable as information reported from children in a game of telephone,” Gottlieb adds. “These claims remain completely untethered from reality—to be clear: the conversations as described did not happen, and we will hold Mr. Freedman accountable for his misconduct.”
Well-known to be close to Lively and the godmother to one of her children, IEWU soundtrack contributor Swift has made several cameos in various lawsuits and countersuits ever since Lively on December 20 filed her sexual harassment and retaliation complaint with California’s Civil Rights Department.
In addition to being brought on to the Sony-distributed film’s soundtrack, Swift had a walk-on at Lively’s NYC apartment at one point during production backing her friend’s script rewrites to a cowered Baldoni. Along with the volumes of text message released by all sides, Swift is also mentioned as a “dragon” for Lively in an exchange between Lively and Baldoni. Still, the subpoena issued earlier this month kicked it up a level or two for the scandal-adverse Swift coming off her record-breaking global Eras Tour that ended in December 2024.
Now, while the battle of the Swift subpoena continues in courtsl, it looks like all’s good between Lively and “Bad Blood” singer.
For Lively and Baldoni, with parties like the New York Times, Deadpool star Reynolds, various publicists and Lively herself seeking to be dismissed from the sprawling legal actions, the trial date of March 9, 2026 is still on the books.
Best of Deadline
Sign up for Deadline’s Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
The post Judge Grants Blake Lively’s Request To Have “Improper” Taylor Swift Bullying Claims Tossed Out appeared first on Deadline.
