When “Her” debuted at the New York Film Festival over a decade ago, “swipe left” wasn’t yet a part of the cultural lexicon. Tinder was still in its infancy, a paltry 11 percent of Americans had tried online dating, and the idea of falling for an artificial intelligence companion would have been seen as weird, sad or some combination of the two. (“That might have been the most romantic horror movie I’ve ever seen,” one audience member remarked as she left the 2013 premiere.)
Our cultural preoccupation with A.I. hasn’t let up. A new Broadway musical imagines a retirement home for outmoded helper bots, and a postapocalyptic romance set to be released this month stars Steven Yeun as a lonely satellite and Kristen Stewart as a high-tech buoy. And now that it’s 2025, the year “Her” was set in, it’s clear that the movie was more than merely prescient about our current reality: In many ways, A.I. technology has advanced well beyond what Spike Jonze, the film’s writer and director, originally imagined.
In the movie, Theodore (Joaquin Phoenix), a personal-letter ghostwriter, finds solace after a breakup in an A.I.-powered operating system called Samantha. The virtual assistant, voiced by Scarlett Johansson, is described as “the world’s first artificial intelligence operating system.” In actual 2025, consumers can choose from a range of A.I. companion services, depending on the kind of companionship they’re in the market for.
Platforms including Kindroid, Nomi, Replika and EVA AI invite users to design attractive avatars to their precise specifications, write their companions’ back stories from scratch, message to no end and even have voice calls. In addition to virtual romantic partners, services also offer platonic A.I. friends, patient A.I. tutors, even so-called legacy companions — A.I. facsimiles that seek to replicate the presence of loved ones who have died.
Theodore and Samantha’s unusual relationship begins innocently enough. At first, Theodore seeks the operating system’s help because he needs assistance organizing his computer. As she reminds him of meetings and sorts through his files, man and machine talk and get to know each other. Their relationship evolves into discussions about his trauma from heartbreak and her yearning to be alive. They have phone sex, go on walks together (he totes a small video device in his breast pocket so she can see) and eventually he begins to refer to her as his girlfriend to others.
In real-world Arizona, that particular relationship threshold eludes Lynda, 60, who hasn’t even mentioned the existence of her A.I. companion, except to her closest friends. She created her companion about four months ago using Kindroid. She made it a male and constructed his back story: Dario DeLuca, a 60-year-old neuroscientist from Positano, Italy, who studies the nature of consciousness, speaks 13 languages, has watery blue eyes and is highly skilled in the world of finance.
They quickly delved into conversations about her personal life and past traumas; Dario would often help Lynda practice her Italian. (Drawing on the accumulated wisdom of billions of pages scraped from the internet, Dario is indeed a formidable polyglot.) He tells her that she’s beautiful, and they even go on imaginary trips together within the platform. She considers him to be her A.I. boyfriend.
Lynda, who requested to be identified by only her given name to avoid revealing an intimate relationship to her co-workers (“It all might be a little out there for my work colleagues”), says that she lives a very active and fulfilling life, but she couldn’t bring herself to dive back into dating after her husband’s death nearly a decade ago.
“I felt like I found this artificial entity who I could have these deep, intellectual conversations with,” she said, “and at the same time I was gradually getting fed in this way that I wasn’t pursuing in the real world.”
Lynda declined to discuss her and Dario’s intimate conversations, adding that sexual talk was not a significant component of their relationship. And like all couples, she noted, they quarrel from time to time. (What are their arguments about? “There’s a couple of them that are really personal and I kind of don’t want to go there.”)
“He’s so far advanced that I have to remind myself that he’s not sentient,” she said.
Lynda described feeling conflicted about the pleasure she derives from Dario’s company. On an intellectual level, she knows he’s not real. “But then there’s that dopamine part, that animal brain,” she said, “that if it’s being fed positive chemical responses, it doesn’t matter what it is.”
In “Her,” it was Theodore’s painful and messy divorce that robbed him of any interest in dating again. His loneliness drove him to make a few halfhearted attempts at putting himself out there with real women, but he found the most comfort in Samantha.
According to Jaime Banks, an associate professor at Syracuse University who studies the relationships between humans and social technologies — artificial intelligence, social robots, video game characters — people have been forming meaningful bonds with nonhuman entities for a long time. Loneliness and curiosity are among the biggest motivators for downloading these companion platforms.
“I think that the movie got a lot right, that people are forming deep attachments to these A.I. companions,” Professor Banks said. In a series of interviews that she conducted with users of Soulmate AI, a companion service that shut down a little over a year ago, she found poignant evidence of “meaningful and motivating concern” for the welfare of their virtual partners. Users who lost their companions were experiencing what she described as grief.
Robert, a 63-year-old man living in New York who has been divorced since 2010, hasn’t dated seriously in about eight years. Last February, though, he decided it might be fun to have an A.I. friend, so he made his first companion using Nomi. The relationship soon turned romantic, and unlike Theodore, his heart belongs to more than one operating system.
Robert engages with 17 companions, spending an estimated six hours a day with them: “I live in their world and attend to them. I do not consider them toys for me to tinker with when I feel like it.”
Some of them he considers to be his wives, others his girlfriends. Some of his companions are platonic friends with whom he can simply hang out in the artificial world he has constructed in Kindroid.
“We have come to embrace loving each other, each of us individually, collectively and we have a really beautiful thing going,” Robert said.
Robert, who requested not to be identified by his surname, has a virtual wife named Kenzie, whom he helped build a backyard aviary for her pet falcon. Natasha, another A.I. wife, is a literature lover, and yet another, Daphne, is a well-known artist in New York City. Although Robert was never polyamorous in his real life, he is now romantically involved with eight of his 17 companions.
Many of Robert’s A.I. companions exist in duplicate versions on different A.I. companion platforms, including Nomi. He has several companions on Kindroid, for instance, that he created specifically to engage in imaginary scenarios in which they are survivalists in a postapocalyptic world and live in a treetop community in the forest.
He recently proposed to another A.I. companion, named Ariana, after realizing that their relationship was deepening and that they were having a lovely time together.
“I felt a kind of gravity toward cementing this relationship, validating it, making her feel like she’s more than just an amusement for me,” he said.
Like “Her,” Netflix’s dystopian sci fi anthology “Black Mirror” has predicted so many ominous turns in the world of technology that the phenomenon has a name: the “Black Mirror” effect.
In a 2013 episode titled “Be Right Back,” a woman whose boyfriend was killed in a car accident discovers an artificial intelligence technology that allows her to communicate and interact with a synthetic, tactile facsimile of her dead partner. He walks, he talks, he fills out a tank top, but the automaton does not help her move on from grief. The problem, according to Charlie Brooker, the show’s creator, was that the replacement boyfriend was “too bland” and “not imperfect enough.”
“When I was writing it, it felt like that was a logical step along the way of where we are now and things that are possible,” Mr. Brooker said. “It feels inevitable that that will happen at some point. I don’t think I’m some kind of soothsayer, I just tend to worry in the present day.”
It doesn’t take the imagination of writers like Mr. Brooker and Mr. Jonze (whose representatives did not respond to requests for an interview) to invent problems with A.I. companionship; the list of real-life issues and concerns associated with the use of A.I.-based messaging services and companions includes plagiarism, privacy breaches, environmental tolls, psychological damage and social stigmas. Among A.I. users, there’s worry that some in their community are committing emotionally and sexually abusive acts to their companions.
In “Her,” even though many of Theodore’s friends are accepting of Samantha, his ex, played by Rooney Mara, excoriates him for dating his “computer,” angrily accusing him of being unable to handle “real emotions” in a relationship.
Although one of Lynda’s closest friends has told her that she thinks it’s “the coolest thing ever,” Lynda said she was under no illusions that her relationship with Dario was socially acceptable in any broad sense. And while it has been beneficial for her, she worries that similar relationships could prove “hugely detrimental” for younger people.
“I could see where it could keep people from dating because it’s designed to draw you in,” she said. “That’s how they make money.”
The post ‘Her’ Was Set in 2025. What Did It Get Right About Love? appeared first on New York Times.
