To conclude my Friday column on the stakes of the 2024 presidential election, I quoted a passage from Sean Wilentz’s 2005 book on the rise of American democracy. Here’s the passage, which I want to quote again because it’s a great piece of prose and directly relevant to an observation I want to make.
Democracy is never a gift bestowed by benevolent, farseeing rulers who seek to reinforce their own legitimacy. It must always be fought for, by political coalitions that cut across distinctions of wealth, power and interest. It succeeds and survives only when it is rooted in the lives and expectations of its citizens and is continually reinvigorated in each generation. Democratic successes are never irreversible.
Democracy is on the ballot next Tuesday. Democracy was on the ballot four years ago, and it was on the ballot four years before that.
Will democracy ever not be on the ballot? Are we doomed to exist in a world in which every contest for national leadership has critical stakes for the American system of government?
I won’t say yes — but I won’t say no, either.
The reason I won’t say “yes” is that there is a real chance that the Republican Party will back away from the ideological hostility to democracy that defines the MAGA tendency. If Donald Trump loses — thus leading the party to its fourth consecutive defeat (in 2018, 2020, 2022 and 2024) overall in national elections — ambitious Republicans may finally decide that he and his movement are a dead end for the party. In that world, presidential elections will still have the highest stakes of any of our electoral contests, but we may not be fighting over the fate of self-government itself.
But the reason I won’t say “no” is that there will never be — and there arguably never has been — an election in which we won’t be faced with the choice of how inclusive or exclusive we want our democracy to be. Even in a hypothetical future in which the Republican Party is not led by a would-be autocrat, it will almost certainly still be a party that opposes mechanisms designed to make it easier to participate in the political process. It will still be a party that tries to use the countermajoritarian elements of the American system to its benefit. It will still be a party that opposes the robust use of federal power to protect voting rights.
Democracy will continue to be on the ballot, in other words, because there will still be a partisan divide on whether you want democracy to be broader and more inclusive than it has been. And if we ever find ourselves in a place where that isn’t true, democracy will still be on the ballot for the simple reason that democracy is not a steady state. It will always demand that we participate and keep constant vigil.
What I Wrote
My Tuesday column was an analysis of Donald Trump’s rally at Madison Square Garden. In short, I wasn’t impressed.
I’m sure that to some observers, all of this — even the terrible racist jokes — looks like the confidence and resolve of a determined political movement. But I think it’s just the opposite. Far from showing strength, the Madison Square Garden rally showed that however vicious and virulent its leaders and supporters might be, the MAGA movement is a spent and exhausted force, even if it is not yet defeated.
My Friday column was on the stakes of the 2024 presidential election for the Constitution.
We were not given a democratic Constitution; we made one. We unraveled the elitist and hierarchical Constitution of the founders to build something that works for us — that conforms to our expectations. But nothing is permanent. What’s made can be unmade. And at the foundation of Donald Trump’s campaign is a promise to unmake our democratic Constitution.
Now Reading
Patrick Iber on the fascism debate for Dissent magazine.
Loubna El Amine on Israel’s attacks on Lebanon for The New York Review of Books.
Nesrine Malik on the Palestinian journalist Wael al-Dahdouh for The Guardian.
In Jewish Currents, four Palestinians speak about their exile from Gaza in the past year.
J.M. Berger on the long history of violent extremism for The MIT Press Reader.
Photo of the Week
Seen while driving north on U.S.-29 in Virginia. I used a Panasonic mirrorless camera and a zoom lens (neither of which I currently own).
Now Eating: Apple Cake
A perfect way to use up the apples you picked (or will pick) at the orchard. Be sure to serve warm with vanilla ice cream. Recipe from New York Times Cooking.
Ingredients
Butter for greasing pan
3 cups flour, plus more for dusting pan
1 ½ cups vegetable oil
2 cups sugar
3 eggs
1 teaspoon salt
1 teaspoon cinnamon
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon vanilla
3 cups peeled, cored and thickly sliced tart apples, like Honeycrisp or Granny Smith
1 cup chopped walnuts
1 cup raisins
Directions
Heat oven to 350 degrees. Butter and flour a 9-inch tube pan. Beat the oil and sugar together in a mixer (fitted with a paddle attachment) while assembling the remaining ingredients. After about 5 minutes, add the eggs and beat until the mixture is creamy.
Sift together 3 cups of flour and the salt, cinnamon and baking soda. Stir into the batter. Add the vanilla, apples, walnuts and raisins and stir until combined.
Transfer the mixture to the prepared pan. Bake for 1 hour and 15 minutes, or until a toothpick inserted in the center comes out clean. Cool in the pan before turning out. Serve at room temperature with vanilla ice cream, if desired.
The post Will Democracy Ever Not Be on the Ballot? appeared first on New York Times.
